doubt as to the additional care capital stock plagues now - after the sister party CSU - the CDU, however, there are with a bad date to acknowledge this openly. (Such slot ears!)
Look at that! Although they believe in the need to increase the capital reserves of care, but this knowledge has come to "untimely" . Aha!
Naturally, the capitalist party to Philipp Rösler pissed and makes the statement that the introduction of individualized capital stock "non-negotiable" is .
Upps .... Now we have got so the taboo word for the year 2011 reported in the first month of the year. Angie said to us "essential" in the last year of , it is understood that Mr Roesler and his friends go one better with the taboo word "non-negotiable" . Would it then really only the signatures of the men and women plan to the contracts at non-negotiable, right? But that simply can not and must not be between three partners. And, these parties still scratching their statements yesterday in the coalition agreement, especially if one believes to be so cunning, now read quite different from this than what we heard and then had given the nod. Seems a normal process to be here in this country.
Not that the interested reader thinks that I would be upset about the handling of this coalition together, because I would support the project of the FDP, far from it, shows me here just once again very clearly, for how stupid are these people in Berlin hold in their cloud-cuckoo-home if they think they have to whisper softly, so that we would remove them with a friendly and collegial interaction with each other, which would undoubtedly be necessary to further the great and difficult tasks of this country results-oriented (including such a slogan - laughing -) and therefore to act in the spirit of the citizens of this country.
Bübchen Philip and his colleagues are outraged at this treatment by the CDU / CSU and create flight is not very imaginative taboo word "non-negotiable" (because somehow yes Angie , more rights to the " un" .... when Philip and Co.)
And why non-negotiable? Na!, But because it is in the coalition agreement that a second column or so ago must ......
The knowledge of the two Sisters, that it has so far been no talks between political groups, parties and the Ministry of Health, and in the knowledge that many election is due this year in the countries and the "cocky" problem FDP could do a bit more of itself - so hope the sisters seems the concept of untimely for the wrong time to put language on "Care of capital stock" to have produced.
And what should we tell the citizens and voters?
Look at that! Although they believe in the need to increase the capital reserves of care, but this knowledge has come to "untimely" . Aha!
Naturally, the capitalist party to Philipp Rösler pissed and makes the statement that the introduction of individualized capital stock "non-negotiable" is .
Upps .... Now we have got so the taboo word for the year 2011 reported in the first month of the year. Angie said to us "essential" in the last year of , it is understood that Mr Roesler and his friends go one better with the taboo word "non-negotiable" . Would it then really only the signatures of the men and women plan to the contracts at non-negotiable, right? But that simply can not and must not be between three partners. And, these parties still scratching their statements yesterday in the coalition agreement, especially if one believes to be so cunning, now read quite different from this than what we heard and then had given the nod. Seems a normal process to be here in this country.
Not that the interested reader thinks that I would be upset about the handling of this coalition together, because I would support the project of the FDP, far from it, shows me here just once again very clearly, for how stupid are these people in Berlin hold in their cloud-cuckoo-home if they think they have to whisper softly, so that we would remove them with a friendly and collegial interaction with each other, which would undoubtedly be necessary to further the great and difficult tasks of this country results-oriented (including such a slogan - laughing -) and therefore to act in the spirit of the citizens of this country.
Bübchen Philip and his colleagues are outraged at this treatment by the CDU / CSU and create flight is not very imaginative taboo word "non-negotiable" (because somehow yes Angie , more rights to the " un" .... when Philip and Co.)
And why non-negotiable? Na!, But because it is in the coalition agreement that a second column or so ago must ......
The knowledge of the two Sisters, that it has so far been no talks between political groups, parties and the Ministry of Health, and in the knowledge that many election is due this year in the countries and the "cocky" problem FDP could do a bit more of itself - so hope the sisters seems the concept of untimely for the wrong time to put language on "Care of capital stock" to have produced.
And what should we tell the citizens and voters?